BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, with unpredictable responses to chemotherapy. Approaches to assay patient tumors before treatment and identify effective treatment regimens based on tumor sensitivities are lacking. We developed an organoid-based platform (OBP) to visually quantify patient-derived organoid (PDO) responses to drug treatments and associated tumor-stroma modulation for personalized PDAC therapy.METHODS We retrospectively quantified apoptotic responses and tumor-stroma cell proportions in PDOs via 3D immunofluorescence imaging through annexin A5, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) levels. Simultaneously, an ex vivo organoid drug sensitivity assay (ODSA) was used to measure responses to standard-of-care regimens. Differences between ODSA results and patient tumor responses were assessed by exact McNemar’s test.RESULTS Immunofluorescence signals, organoid growth curves, and Ki-67 levels were measured and authenticated through the OBP for up to 14 days. ODSA drug responses were not different from patient tumor responses, as reflected by CA19-9 reductions following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.99). PDOs demonstrated unique apoptotic and tumor-stroma modulation profiles (P < 0.0001). α-SMA/CK-19 ratio levels of more than 1.0 were associated with improved outcomes (P = 0.0179) and longer parental patient survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.0046).CONCLUSION Heterogenous apoptotic drug responses and tumor-stroma modulation are present in PDOs after standard-of-care chemotherapy. Ratios of α-SMA and CK-19 levels in PDOs are associated with patient survival, and the OBP could aid in the selection of personalized therapies to improve the efficacy of systemic therapy in patients with PDAC.FUNDING NIH/National Cancer Institute grants (K08CA218690, P01 CA117969, R50 CA243707-01A1, U54CA224065), the Skip Viragh Foundation, the Bettie Willerson Driver Cancer Research Fund, and a Cancer Center Support Grant for the Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Core Facility (P30CA16672).
Ya’an Kang, Jenying Deng, Jianhua Ling, Xinqun Li, Yi-Ju Chiang, Eugene J. Koay, Huamin Wang, Jared K. Burks, Paul J. Chiao, Mark W. Hurd, Manoop S. Bhutani, Jeffrey H. Lee, Brian R. Weston, Anirban Maitra, Naruhiko Ikoma, Ching-Wei D. Tzeng, Jeffrey E. Lee, Ronald A. DePinho, Robert A. Wolff, Shubham Pant, Florencia McAllister, Matthew H.G. Katz, Jason B. Fleming, Michael P. Kim
Usage data is cumulative from May 2023 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,867 | 536 |
405 | 189 | |
Figure | 720 | 4 |
Table | 91 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 228 | 42 |
Citation downloads | 64 | 0 |
Totals | 3,375 | 771 |
Total Views | 4,146 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.