“Receptors recognize a distinct chemical entity and translate information from that entity into a form that the cell can read to alter its state”(Kenakin et al., 1992). Even though the receptors are often pharmacologically defined on the basis of synthetic compounds, they are assumed to have developed to respond to endogenous molecules. Therefore, receptors are generally named on the basis of their natural ligands. Hence, it is appropriate to very briefly summarize the evidence that purine nucleotides and nucleosides are natural ligands for a wide class of receptors.

In a seminal paper, Drury and Szent-Györgyi (1929) showed that adenosine exerted a large number of biological effects, including bradycardia and vasodilation. A wider interest in the role of adenosine followed from the demonstration in 1963 that adenosine can be produced by the hypoxic heart. Two groups independently formulated the hypothesis that adenosine may be involved in the metabolic regulation of coronary blood flow (Berne, 1963; Gerlach et al., 1963). The observation by de Gubareff and Sleator (1965) that the actions of adenosine in heart tissue could be blocked by caffeine suggested the existence of an adenosine receptor. The potent cardiovascular effects of adenosine led to an interest in the synthesis of new adenosine analogs, and careful dose-response studies with a number of these drugs (Cobbin et al., 1974) strongly suggested the presence of a receptor for adenosine-like compounds. Sattin and Rall (1970) reported that adenosine increased cyclic AMP accumulation in slices of rodent brain and that this adenosine-induced second-messenger response was blocked by methylxanthines. Their findings suggested that adenosine receptors exist in the central nervous system. The essentially simultaneous findings by Mcilwain (1972), that such brain